If you don't prepare heavy defences and end up with an aggressive neighbour, you're dead. The problem is that how your neighbours will play depends exclusively on luck. If two aggressive player meet, they will probably be very happy, maybe they will form a coalition or they will kill each other, but either way, this is what they signed up for. Naturally, if an aggressive player meets a peaceful one, it is clear who will win, this is why nobody will - or should - ever play 100% peacefully. If you are going to play more aggressively, you are going to go for the military techs and build attack units. You are going to build more settlers, eventually Granaries and keep only a bare minimum of defence. If you are going to play peacefully, you will go for constructive tech that will allow your nation to grow stronger, more advanced, more efficient. When starting a game, you choose your level of aggression and adjust your development path accordingly. As a Longturn (so, multiplayer) ruleset meddler, I am being unable to solve a problem that has its core far beyond the games of Free(or any other)civ, but it is definitely emphasized in this game.
0 kommentar(er)
